Save the Earth, Save Yourself (Seeing in the Dark, Part 3)
I promised to write about the environmental and scientific consequences of reading the land as darkness, in an embodied science, rather than as light (the kind of science we have today). I meant no criticism of science or of the strength of its method, only a method for working with (and even viewing) what it cannot apprehend because of its initial assumptions. Here’s one.
Ah, over to you…
You: Harold, you’ve been taking blurry photos in the fog again, haven’t you? What is it with you and the fog?
Ummm…
You: Oh, you poor crazy thing. OK, I’ll play along. What is that?
Ah! I thought you’d never ask. It’s this!
You: So, a bluff above Kalamalka Lake, in Vernon, British Columbia. In the fog. Harold. It’s rock. In the fog.
Well, it’s a story, see. A rocky mountain sheep, with two lambs and a trickster rabbit. It changes every time you…
View original post 1,490 more words
